Cookies on
this website

This website uses cookies, some of which have already been set as they are essential to the site's operation. You may delete and block all cookies, but parts of the site will then not function.

I accept cookies from this site Allow Cookies


By Mike Fenster


Despite leaving Egypt with vast herds of cattle and sheep, and witnessing (at the start of this Sedrah) one of the greatest miracles ever (the crossing of the Red Sea), within six weeks of the Exodus the children of Israel have staged a mass protest against death by famine. Their protest is effective, but there is anger and frustration in God’s reply: he will rain down (mamtir) bread from the heavens. In the past God had rained down (himtir) fire and brimstone on Sodom and Gomorrah, and more recently rained down (vayamter) hail upon the Egyptians. So perhaps the Israelites expect something more problematic than just ‘bread’.

They called it manna, but at first they had no idea what it was. Knowing I work in pharmaceuticals, friends ask me if they should take a certain medicine after the expiry date. But the shelf life for manna was a real problem – 24 hours. By the next morning it was unfit to eat, wormy and stinking. Except that Friday’s manna had a 48-hour shelf life.  And the manna that Aaron was commanded in Chapter 26 to place inside a jar in the Mishkan survived for centuries.

It isn’t surprising that the Israelites were perplexed by manna. It looked like coriander seed, white and flaky, and lay on the morning dew. It tasted like wafers dipped in honey (think granola), although in Bamidbar it tastes of oil (Num. 11:8), and later midrash explained that it could taste of whatever the person desired. It wasn’t a convenience food – it needed to be ground and baked; but midrash did envisage a form of door-to-door delivery.  The Talmud (Yoma 75a) explains that in a dispute between two Hebrews about whether one had stolen a slave, Moses would wait until the next day to deliver his ruling. The next morning he’d visit the houses of the two disputants; the amount of manna in each house would tell him how many people were in the house, and therefore who was harbouring the slave.

What may have been most perplexing was why God was making the people collect this manna each day. If it could last two days, then why not one week? The disciples of R. Shimon b. Yochai asked him this, and he answered with a parable (Yoma 75b). A king ordered that his son’s rations should be issued just once a year, so the son came to see his father only once a year. The king became angry, and also a bit sad, and ordered that the rations should be issued daily, so that the son was compelled to see his father every day. So it was with the Israelites. Whoever had a family worried for them and said ‘Perhaps no manna will descend tomorrow, and we will all starve’, so they prayed to Heaven every day, which R. Shimon b. Yochai presumably thought was good for the Israelites and for God.

But there was a downside. This sense of fear – would there be food tomorrow? – and dependency sapped the people’s spirit. In a few months, after the 12 spies return from their mission, the people will face some big decisions on whether they can take on the Canaanites in battle. They go with the opinion of the majority of the spies, vote to return to Egypt, fail that challenge, and ironically sentence themselves to another 39 years of manna.

Mike Fenster is a longstanding member of Kol Nefesh Masorti Synagogue.

Posted on 8 February 2017

This blog aims to provide articles of interest on the weekly parashah and issues in Masorti Judaism, representing the full range of diverse views that exist among Masorti members. For guidance on any of the issues raised, please consult your rabbi.

What are your thoughts?

Reply to comment Cancel

No comments